Roebuck gamer picture for prestiging for the first time and Sgt. Reznov for the 10th time. There are also co-op challenges that will give the player XP. Also, players are allowed to brutally Gib enemy soldiers, as in campaign. Throughout the players experience in the multiplayer of Call of Duty: World at War , the player will go through a series of ranks.
The ranks up to level 65 are listed on the right of the page. The prestige ranks are located on the left. As the player increase in level, the player unlocks new weapons, additional grenades, and perks. Once level 65 is reached, the player has the option to go into Prestige mode. While this does reset the players rank and all the player's challenge progress, it also works toward unlocking extra class slots for Create-A-Class.
World at War had 13 multiplayer maps plus a zombie map when it came out, a free multiplayer map was given later within a patch, and three map packs each containing three new multiplayer maps and a free zombie map resulting in a total of 23 Multiplayer maps and 4 zombie maps.
Call of Duty: World at War has three killstreaks just as Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare did, but the 5 and 7 killstreaks are different:. A major difference between the multiplayer in World at War and the multiplayer in the Modern Warfare games is the ability to drive a tank in some maps. Therefore, Vehicle Perks are included in-game.
Tanks can be used for both Tank -based combat as well as killing infantry. However, areas tanks can access on maps are limited, allowing infantry to escape when an enemy tank is nearby.
Another feature of the tank is the ability to switch position on the tank from either the main turret or a machine gun mounted on the top this is not possible if another player is in the other gun of the Tank. While using the top machine gun, it is possible to crouch for added protection.
Tanks are relatively hard to take out. While most of time this may occur in tank-based combat though tanks have enough armor that a driver can easily get out and get away before his tank blows up. The M9A1 Bazooka and the Sticky Grenade can be used to take out tanks from a more medium to long range approach, but this requires at least two players working together to take it out. Another option is using satchel charges to destroy the tank. This, however, either forces the player to get close to the tank which is generally a bad idea as either the tank will see the player or might even run over them or placing satchel charges, moving to another location where they can watch the charges, and then blowing them up when the tank rolls over them this, however, requires good analyzing of where the tank more than likely is going to go.
When using a certain class of weapon in Multiplayer, an appropriate skin is used to match the class of weapon. Each class and faction has a different skin. After having completed the campaign, watched the credits which can simply be skipped , or being connected to online, players can automatically start a game of Nazi Zombies in the map Nacht der Untoten. The player must defend against waves of Nazi zombies by buying new weapons, unlocking new areas, and boarding up windows.
Boarding up windows or damaging zombies gives points which can be used to unlock access to new areas and buy weapons. The three map packs have brought new content such as the Pack-A-Punch Machine that upgrades certain weapons, Perk-a-Cola machines that give perks to players for a certain amount of points, and a new enemy, the Hellhounds. A new Nazi Zombies map comes with every multiplayer map pack.
Kar98k , Thompson , FG42 , etc. If the customer pre-ordered the game at Gamestop then the M1A1 Carbine will be put in the first slot of the rifleman class. As far as the advantages go for having bought it, the high-end weaponry gives one an in-game boost.
In fact, the FG is unlocked well into multiplayer, and the M1A1 Carbine is the last unlocked weapon. It is similar but has toned-down graphics. It includes two American campaigns and a British campaign, while removing the Soviet campaign.
The original version of this game lacks an extra American campaign and a British campaign, although it includes a Soviet Campaign. Final Fronts also does not feature Nazi Zombies.
It includes the Pacific campaign, the Soviet campaign, and a British campaign. The American campaign tells the story of Rook , a new member of the USMC, as he participates in the effort to defeat Japanese forces and take over Shuri Castle , the British campaign features Dawkins of the SAS, as he assists in pushing German forces back towards Berlin, and the Soviet campaign allows the player to take control of Dimarkurato , a private of the Red Army, as he participates in the Battle of Seelow Heights and assault the Reichstag.
Call of Duty Wiki Explore. Cold War. Weapons in Explore Wikis Community Central. Register Don't have an account? Call of Duty: World at War. View source. History Talk Do you like this video? Play Sound. Soviet Air Force. M2 Flamethrower. This is my favourite Cod game in the series Definitely worth a play. All the way through, Call of Duty World at War is an absolute masterpiece that every fan of the series should play.
Even though it was released quite a few years ago, I think it's aged perfectly. It's both satisfying to play, but can also get people not familiar with WWII interested in researching the historical events and battles seen in the game.
The game is very accurate in it's brutal depiction of war, and I honestly can't think of another game this unapologetic with it's source material. It has the balls to avoid being safe, and instead decides to show the true horrors of war.
And because of that, it's why fans prefer this game instead of Call of Duty WWII, because this game is not afraid to take risks and go to some pretty dark and unexpected places in it's gameplay, such as killing surrendered soldiers, body parts being blown off, and showing actual graphic footage from the war.
Campaign: The game depicts two sides of the Second World War. You play as both an American soldier, fighting the Japanese in the Pacific, and a Russian soldier fighting the Germans in Europe. It is interesting to finally have the Japs as enemies in a Call of Duty game, and the gameplay in the Pacific is fun to play, but I thought the story and characters should've been written a bit better. In my opinion, the gameplay in Europe is far more better.
The European campaign also improves in terms of story and characters. Multiplayer: I found the multiplayer in this game very fun and enjoyable, and the maps are nicely designed, and are big enough for the player to explore. And is cool the use WWII weapons in multiplayer. It was just as fun and simple as it needed to be. This was back when multiplayer was still fresh and good, mind you. Nazi Zombies: Being the first Call of Duty game to include zombies mode, and think they nailed. It's extremely fun to mow down undead German soldiers, using a bunch of cool new weapons like the Ray Gun.
The story in the first mission, Nacht Der In Toten is very simple to follow. You play as an American soldier who's planes been shot down, and you have to take refuge in a bunker of sorts, defending yourself against a bunch of Nazi zombies.
It was very fun to play, and when I'm ever playing this game, it's mostly spent in Nazi zombies, so that's saying a lot. HowlingRabbit 19 December This game is a really genuine shooter, with intense battles and so much more. I mean, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare brought something new to the series, because it's not set in the second World War. Despite the drawbacks of this game, the battles and gameplay are pretty interesing.
Multiplayer has improved with new perks, Nazi Zombies has been inserted as an extra feature, and the missions are quite fun, although a bit too WWII-ish. All in all, Call of Duty: World at War is a game which fans of the Call of Duty series would enjoy, but not one for gamers who like advanced and sophisticated settings.
This game set up the black ops franchise and is very good. The campaign has you play as the Soviet Union and Americans in Japan. It is a realistic game and very gritty. It is underrated and should be appreciated more. Amonguscyan 16 August This game relates to horrors of World War 2 i.
Also, the tactics the Japanese uses to ambush us. Now it's all PC and doesn't show it how it was. I don't like playing like the communists were good guys though. I wish it we're all American or British soldiers.
But a great game nonetheless! Spooky music,amazing gameplay,graphics suitable for this game and bonus that went into other games. This game is like you learning the history,except you play it and enjoy it more. Why can't Activision publish COD games like this? If released two years earlier this title would be a game that everyone would be waxing lyrical about.
However, it followed in the footsteps of the fantastically addictive Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Anyway, what is done is done and Treyarch tried to make the best game they could. As happens on all games the first impression you have is of its graphical capabilities. They take some getting used to if you've played Modern Warfare meticulously but the details on everything are very realistic and its refreshing to see a game set in different locations such as Russia and Japan.
The sound quality in the game is as impressive as its predecessor as well. Now the most important factor whats the game-play like? For those who delve into the campaign, its almost on a par with Modern Warfare.
It lacks the intensity and brutality of Modern Warfare's campaign mode but makes up for this with its interesting set pieces on the Eastern Front and in the Pacific. One level replicates the fantastic Chernoybal snipers levels from number 4 but moves the action to Stalingrad.
It doesn't hit you with the same 'wow' factor as the levels in the predecessor but its still a great level. Overall, the campaign mode is incredibly enjoyable to play through but the main criticism is, its even shorter than the campaign mode in Call of Duty 4. And that was short. Now to the online mode. Franky it is excellent, the problem is if you are not a newcomer to the series: it is no Modern Warfare. The matches are a lot of fun and contain a good mixture of close quarters combat and long distance shooting.
Tanks spice proceedings up nicely too. The maps are generally well constructed, however some are just too big. A particular level called Outskirts is insanely large and there are few kills to be made on this map.
The weapons just aren't as fun to play around with as those in Modern Warfare either. I understand that Treyarch are vying for realism but the inclusion of more powerful weapons would have been welcoming. To conclude, World at War is a game that should be played in isolation. Forget that Modern Warfare came before this title and you'll have a lot of fun playing through this.
This should be viewed as a great game and a good stop-gap before Modern Warfare 2. However, it is easier said than done to forget how good Modern Warfare is. You will most probably go back to play it but give World at War a chance - especially you Mr Taylor. It shows a true experience on what World War 2 was like.
The Campaign had you being the allies the Americans and the Russians and you were fighting against the axis the Germans and the Japanese. The Multiplayer was so much fun and so enjoyable and last but not least Zombies. Zombies was the best mode in the game. There was so much things to do and the DLC maps were amazing. I had brought call of duty 4 at a curiosity and it was incredible. I knew this game would be a blast. It was fantastic. It contained the best soundtrack and actors. The campaign had a bloody and gritty feel to it.
The characters were pretty average on the American side of the 2nd world war. But it had a great character in the game. And it was reznov. Victor Reznov. The multiplayer, well kill steaks returned with the 3, 5, 7 kills just as cod 4. Great multiplayer with all the weapons being amazing not including mp40 maps were amazing and overall a great experience. Now nazi zombies has met its dubut at waw.
It was simple not like bo4 with weird as maps. But the thing that made it shine were the characters. All of the game is fantastic. I've read so many articles rubbishing w w and treyarch and I can't help but wonder if they've even given this game a chance.
It seems a lot of people are just unhappy that they've gone back to ww2 and that initial annoyance has tarred their judgement. I played the game and tried not to compare it to cod4 but as it is so simular it's hard not to. If your looking for an opinion on which game is better I honestly couldn't say.
If you stuck w w in having never played cod4 you would be amazed, having played cod4 it isn't so stunning. The graphics are stunning and the gameplay is challenging yet rewarding. The content is much more mature than seen before and this adds to the other-all experience. Genres: First-Person, Action, Shooter.
Moderate 6. Nintendo DS. PlayStation 2. PlayStation 3.
0コメント